Successful Course Conclusion + Course Redesign
Teaching and learning online can, and should, be a rewarding experience. To help ensure your success as an online instructor, and your students' success in the online environment, you should take steps both to effectively conclude the course as well as to assess your course, especially if the course is one recently designed.
There are numerous steps you can take to ensure that students complete the course satisfactorily. There are also steps you can take to identify the course's strong points as well as potential weak spots that you would like to improve before the course is taught again.
The Final Weeks—Fostering Student Success
During the course’s final weeks you'll want to ensure that students are able to complete the course successfully and have positive feelings about their online experience. This is an obvious goal for instructors. In addition, you and your institution would like to retain students. Here then are some final steps to take to ensure students' success--and yours.
Administrative
- Communicate regularly with any students who continue to lag behind. If you allow make-up work, ask students to commit to specific completion dates for missed assignments and track these dates consistently. Ensure that students understand the consequences of failing to submit missed assignments.
- You and the student(s) may feel it's better to let them take an incomplete. Keep in mind that many students who take this option never complete the course. Make sure you and the student(s) understand your institution's policy regarding the assignment of an “Incomplete” as a course grade.
Facilitative
- Communicate with struggling students, for example--by individual email. Provide needed help and additional resources so students can complete assignments and the course.
- Send a group email to let students know that you enjoyed teaching the course, or post an Announcement to this effect on the Course Homepage.
Evaluative
- Remind students about due dates for any final assignments, project or exams.
- Provide feedback to all students about their final projects/assignments. Thank each student for their participation in your final evaluation comments.
- Ask students for honest feedback about how the course could be improved. Though you can ask an open-ended question you should also ask some specific questions about the syllabus, assignments, etc.
The Next Time Around—Course Evaluation & Enhancement
In the ADDIE model of instructional design we are at the “E”valuation phase. In assessing your course you might ask:
· How did students respond to your end of term questionnaire?
· What questions did you receive from students during the course?
· Did discussions achieve the interaction you were seeking?
· Did assignments result in the quality of submissions your were seeking?
· What were the results of reviewing exam-level and item-level statistics?
· What were your subjective thoughts about the course design and delivery?
· If you taught the course again, what would you keep the same? Why?
Now, in the ADDIE model we move into the re- “D”esign, “D”evelopment and “I”mplementation of desired course changes. Here you are addressing:
- What policies and/or procedures were identified which should be clarified, or developed, for the syllabus?
- What aspects of policies and/or procedures should be emphasized in announcements and emails?
- How could you improve content and presentation so the course material would be more easily accessed and/or understood by students?
- How could you improve assignments so they would be more relevant and/or clearly understood by students?
- How could you improve assignment submission guidance?
- How could you improve discussion questions and/or participation requirements so they achieve a robust interaction?
- How could you improve assessments so they are accurate measures of student learning in line with course objectives?
- Were there technical issues or problems that need to be resolved? If yes, who do you need to involve in the process?
Your course should evolve as you teach it. There is no such thing as a perfect course, but after a few semesters, many courses can be outstanding for instructor and students alike!
--Kenneth Switzer, Ph.D.
Senior Academic Trainer & Consultant
Web 2.0: Fan Favorite
I’ve been to 6 conferences in the past 2.5 months – including our very own CiTE conference which was great – and I’ve seen an interesting pattern. If you want plenty of leg room, head to the conference session about curriculum or planning. However, if you want to struggle to find a seat, look for the session with “YouTube” or “Web 2.0” in the title! It’s SRO every time!
I must admit, I was a bit annoyed at Web 2.0 for a while. First off, it annoyed me that we put an iteration on a non-iterative thing – the world wide web. Tim O’Reilly’s marketing term making it into the collective lexicon was annoying…but I’ve gotten over it. Second though was the fascination with two specific web 2.0 concepts: wikis and blogs. Whenever I go to education conferences, it’s these concepts that educators seem to actually be talking about when saying, “Web 2.0.”
I got annoyed because Web 2.0 is SO much more than that! From bookmarking to RSS to polling, the read / write, social web is so much bigger than blogs & wikis! Sites like Utterli.com, Picturetrail.com, wordle.net, and others represent new ways of thinking and framing context, yet have nothing to do with blogging or creating wikis! But then it dawned on me…blogs and wikis make the most sense to educators because they are so similar to tools already in use! Of course!
Think about it – blogs are essentially public journals. Teachers have used journals for years to help students reflect, analyze, and synthesize information. Making them public is a nice benefit for peer review and peer evaluation. Likewise wikis mimic the encyclopedia which was the cornerstone of learning for a century.
As well, one of my other pet peeves is Web 2.0 adoption simply for the sake of adopting technology. But blogs and wikis are quite strategic for most teachers. Because they “get it” having a reason for students to use these social tools is not a stretch. I can respect that.
But I want to encourage you to think beyond the traditional classroom delivery mechanisms and assessments. I want to encourage some creativity today. Daniel Pink, author of “A Whole New Mind” believes that we are entering a time of creativity. I agree with that wholeheartedly. So, in order to model creativity and to show students how to adopt a creative spirit while managing the creative process, let’s start with Web 2.0…
The basic formula is simple. 1. Differentiation (educational variance) can be achieved with new, unique, or diverse agents. (There are currently 850 viable social networking tools out there according to Wired magazine, 2009.) 2. Web 2.0 tools invite new ways of thinking and framing information, while still allowing assessment from teachers, peers, and self. 3. Curriculum Integration takes place when we incorporate new learning structures on top of the foundational learning we’ve traditionally used. So…1 + 2 + 3 = Web 2.0
Take Prosper.com – a website that allows people to create business plans and get micro-loans from individuals. No banks are involved at all. What an amazing case study site for economics, finance, or anything specific to entrepreneurism. Take Lexipedia.com where words are mind-mapped to create clusters of concepts. Wouldn’t that be useful in a literature class or even a class on culture? How about Flowingdata.com where hundreds of graphic presentations of data are illustrated. Shouldn’t this be a tool used by every statistics, quantitative research methods, and systems teacher? What about Thinkature.com – a collaborative website for visual learners where information is represented in multiple ways. Speaking of visualization, have you seen Vuvox.com? This site allows people to create a collage of images that meld together to formalize context.
And that is just a smattering! The key is strategy. There must be an educational reason to use the social network. BUT, remember that nobody can say that your reason is wrong! (Well, somebody can, but it won’t be me!) In other words, why not try it! See if it works. If not, it’s a failed experiment – they happen every day. If it DOES work, congratulations. You now have another weapon in your teacher’s arsenal.
Whether it’s one Web 2.0 concept per term or one per week, there are plenty to try. You can even ask your students for both websites AND application. (What a great essay that could be…) But in the end, you’ll be going down a path you need to go down. Our students will use these tools (and many more) when they leave school. Let’s give them a leg to stand on once they leave our site, ok? And remember, these “tools” are essentially just another way to communicate an idea, concept, or theory, while making it more practical and applicable.
So get on board the Web 2.0 train before Web 3.0 passes you by. The Semantic Web is almost here you know…
Good luck and good teaching!
Jeff D Borden, M.A.
Senior Director of Teaching & Learning
Time to start a technology enhanced outcome management program
Campus leaders are struggling to create learning outcome management programs that contribute to substantive improvements in student achievement. Departments often spend countless hours on manual processes that may meet the letter but not the spirit of accreditation requirements and leave limited time to actually assess curriculum strengths and weaknesses.
In previous blog posts, I’ve discussed the increasing call for student learning accountability at U.S. universities. Applications such as Pearson eCollege’s Learning Outcome Manager work in concert with Learning Management Systems to support data driven solutions that enable thorough analysis and improvement of underperforming outcomes. Any outcome management program must also look at methods for inspiring faculty to develop learning outcomes in their courses as they make the shift from a teaching to a learning paradigm (Barr and Tagg 1995).
In their book “Disrupting Class”, Christensen, Horn, and Johnson (2008) assert that innovation occurs when an organization discovers a new model for delivering goods or services to non-consumers which creates a market on a new plane from the predominant existing market. The rise of the online, for-profit university served as such a disruptive change to the higher education community. A key contribution of the online medium has been its sharp focus on learning outcomes along with its ability to document everything that takes place in the virtual classroom. This, in turn, has pressured traditional universities to play catch-up as faculty are challenged, oftentimes for the first time, to document student learning outcomes.
Essentially, it becomes vital that there be no disconnect between the outcomes creator(s), the professors, the students, and the tasks. Using a curriculum design tool such as Understanding by Design (Wiggins and McTighe, 2006) can help groups deal with the needs of the specific student, while still creating a framework of learning for the collective. This process calls for curriculum integration, problem-based learning, essential knowledge, enduring understanding, and authentic assessment. And in the end, deeper learning outcomes connected to better curriculum design leads to richer data and diagnostic capability.
Technology-based outcome management tools provide institutions with scalable solutions to improve teaching and learning. Well designed programs engage technology to automate what has been an arduous, manual process and provide an opportunity to dramatically increase student cognitive engagement.
References
Barr, R. B. & Tagg, J. (1995, November/December). From teaching to learning--a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change Magazine, 27 (6): 12-25.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wiggins, G., McTighe, J., & Tomlinson, C.A. (2006). Understanding by design and differentiated instruction: Partners in classroom success . San Francisco, CA: ASCD Publishing
Laptop use in class?
Do you allow students to use laptops in your face to face classes? No matter how you answer that question, you are probably not alone. This is a divisive subject which is frequently discussed among instructors. An anecdotal study of the affect of laptop use on classroom performance has recently been discussed in the news. Professor Diane Sieber tracked the academic performance of 17 students who used laptops regularly in one of her classes (presumably for non-class related activities). She found that their average first exam score was 11% lower than for those students who did not use laptops in class. She informed the class of this phenomenon, and several students chose to stop using laptops in class; their exam grade subsequently improved. (You can listen to an interview with Professor Sieber here: Saturday March 28, CU Professor fights “Digital Distraction; and read a Chronicle of Higher Education blog post and comments on the subject here).
The comments on the blog page are perhaps the most interesting aspect of this story, and show the divided opinions on whether or not laptops should be allowed in the classroom.
Here are some comments that highlight different areas of the debate:
-
“It might be interesting to create a laptop zone and see how the students respond—One side of the room for laptop users and the other side of the room for people who don’t want to be distracted.” (Shar, Comment 2)
-
“I’ve had a no-laptops policy in my … classes for about two years due to the abuses and discourtesies noted in the above article, and many other examples. I’ve surveyed students at the end of the semester to find out what they thought of the policy. I was surprised (and gratified) to find out that about two-thirds liked the policy and thought it was a good idea. Very few were strongly opposed.” (David S., Comment 9)
-
“As a “millennnial” myself, I understand that a fair number of my students are more skilled at typing notes than at hand-writing them and are more comfortable (and more efficient) searching through a pdf than flipping pages. I also find the diminished paper waste appealing.” (Don, Comment 10)
-
“Seems to me at least part of the problem is that many faculty have no clue how to use the computer effectively themselves and appear to be trying to preserve the style and form of teaching common when THEY were students. Model the behavior you want to see in your students.” (Nirtak, Comment 18)
-
“Between Facebook, texting and even romance paperbacks, in-class students have more distractions than ever and are increasingly brazen in using these articles. I believe this is to their own detriment. I have decided to accept this reality as an opportunity to improve my own instruction. If my lectures and activities can be more engaging than the entire Internet, everybody benefits.” (Robby Slaughter, Comment 22)
-
“I personally think that the ADA is going to come into play at some point. I for one was TOTALLY distracted by having to try to hand write notes. It was way to slow a process to allow me to keep up. When I started typing or recording my notes I was suddenly able to become fully engaged in classes. This made a huge difference for me, and those who cannot recognize the benefit of technology in this kind of scenario are blind.” (Tim, Comment 23)
-
“Out of all the personal technologies available to students today, I earnestly believe the laptop is one that has the ability to enrich the classroom experience as well as detract from it.” (live_your_passions, Comment 26)
-
“Classes that are heavily content-based and involve repeated problem-solving will likely find laptop use more promising than humanities professors trying to foster small-group discussion on matters that require critical thinking and abstract logic. … Active participation and face-to-face discussion are non-negotiable aspects in the courses I teach, and I have enforced a laptop ban for the past few years with no complaints from students. Sorry if that sounds Luddite, but the computer has not made conversation obsolete.” (Max, Comment 38)
-
“These are college students, not grade school students. If they want to surf the Web rather participate in the lecture, I say, “Let ‘em.” My job is to lecture to those who wish to learn, not treat my students like little children who need reminding to pay attention.” (Dee, Comment 40)
-
“Is it laptop use or surfing the internet that is the problem? … Students need to know how to use the laptop. Just like paper and pencil. Paper and pencil can be used to take notes or it can be used to doodle. One is productive the other is not.” (Bill, Comment 46)
-
“When students are connected to a wireless network via laptop, an incredible opportunity emerges for lessons to be more well-rounded and in-depth. Encourage students to access a course wiki during class to supplement the lecture they are listening to. Perform a real time online survey to gauge understanding. Allow students to submit questions and comments to shape the focus of a lecture. The possibilities are endless. The goal is the same: If technology is used correctly, students will become more engaged. Plug yourself in and see what your students are seeing.” (Aaron Hawkey, Comment 62)
What do you think? What would you allow in your courses?
– Gail E. Krovitz, Ph.D. –
Senior Academic Trainer & Consultant
